ELEC 341

Week 4 - Electro-Mechanical Equivalences

Updated 2017-10-10

There are mathematical similarities between linear electric systems and linear mechanical systems. Every electric system has resistance, capacitance, inductance, state of voltage, and current. Every mechanical system has mass, friction, spring, state of force, and velocity.

For the sake of consistency, let us define the following equivalence:

Note that we can define it the other way, but it means all of the equivalences for resistance, capacitance, inductors, etc will be flipped.

Ohm’s law is , and using our definitions, we can have an Ohm’s law for mechanical systems:

Where is the velocity, is the force, and is some mechanical impedance.


Purely Resistive: in a purely resistive system, by Ohm’s law.

Purely Capacitive: in a purely capacitive system, where is the impedance of the capacitor and is the complex frequency . Notice that we can rearrange the equation to:

Recall from the Laplace transforms that division by is integration in time domain. Thus the voltage in a purely capacitive system is a function of integration of current.

Purely Inductive: in a purely inductive system, , similarly, is the impedance of the inductor. However we can rearrange once again:

Recall multiplication by is taking the derivative. Thus the voltage in a inductive system is a function of rate of change in current.


Purely Friction: in a system only consists of friction (such as a damper), where is the force exerted, is the friction coefficient, and is velocity.

Since we defined earlier that for velocity, then by rearranging we get the relationship

The mechanical impedance for a system with only friction is .

Purely Mass: in a system only consists of mass, , where is mass and is acceleration. To relate this to , notice that is first derivative of . In Laplace domain, this would simply be a multiplication by . Rearrange and we get:

Notice that we’re integrating force in time domain. The mechanical impedance is

Purely Spring: in a spring system, the force by the spring is where is the displacement. Note that we can relate to by integration, or division by in Laplace domain. It follows:

Notice that we’re taking the derivative of force in time domain. The mechanical impedance is .


By matching electrical and mechanical impedances, we get:

Thus, the following electrical LRC system driven by a current source is equivalent to a simple spring mass damper mechanical system driven by some force.


The two systems will have identical response:


We can convert a mechanical system to electrical, or vise versa, and it makes it easy to solve the system (i.e. using mesh / nodal methods / MNA 1 that works on circuits in spring-mass-damper systems).

Generally we can map the components in the two systems one-to-one, however there are some rules regarding the layout:

Example: convert the following mechanical system to its electrical equivalence


Naïve solution: We literally switch all the dampers with resisters, mass with capacitors, and springs with dampers. Then set the leftmost node connecting , and as ground.


This will not yield the same response as it’s not the same system. The two capacitors have none of its nodes connected ground.


Solution: Because we know that mass are relative to ground at all times, we start with capacitors, with one of its end nodes connected to reference.


We also know that the applied force on is relative to ground, so we add the current source to the node shared with , with the other end node connected to ground.


Lastly, we can connect everything else.

  1. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Modified_nodal_analysis